Breadcrumb
- Home
- Negotiate a Contract
- Outgoing Subawards
- Revising an Existing Subaward
Amending an Existing Subaward
Main navigation
-
Outgoing Subawards
- Administrative Procedures for New Subawards
- Advance Payments - Outgoing Subawards
- Before you Request a New Subaward
- Conflict of Interest
- Cost/Price Reasonableness FAQ
- Initiating a Subaward
- Outgoing Subaward Request
- Outgoing Subaward Roles and Responsibilities: Accounts Payable (AP)
- Outgoing Subaward Roles and Responsibilities: Conflict of Interest Conflict of Interest Office (COIR)
- Outgoing Subaward Roles and Responsibilities: Division of Sponsored Programs (DSP)
- Outgoing Subaward Roles and Responsibilities: Grant Accounting Office (GAO)
- Outgoing Subaward Roles and Responsibilities: Principal Investigator/Department
- Outgoing Subaward Roles and Responsibilities: Purchasing
- Revising an Existing Subaward
- Sole Source Justification FAQ
- Subaward - Agreement Type
- Subaward Close Out
- Subaward FAQ
- What is the difference between a Subaward, a Consulting/Professional Services Agreement, and a Contractor/Fee for Service Purchase Order?
- Contracts
All revisions, amendments, and modifications to existing subawards must be made in writing and signed by both the University of Iowa and the Subrecipient. This includes changes to the Key Personnel involved at the Subrecipient entity, changes to the budget or statement of work, and any other programmatic or administrative changes.
To request a revision of an existing subaward with funding and/or time to the Subrecipient, initiate an amendment through the DSP Research Tracker.
Any proposed revision must be consistent with University of Iowa policies and the terms of the original grant or contract.
In some cases, the sponsor of the original grant or contract must approve all revisions. If this is applicable, DSP will notify the Principal Investigator of the proper procedures.
After a proposed revision has been drafted by DSP and signed by both the University of Iowa and the Subrecipient, the administrative procedures are similar to those of new subawards.